Blog
We keep you up-to-date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.
Understanding Tax Deductions for Scam Losses
Analyzing the tax consequences of scams and theft-related financial losses can be intricate, especially given shifts in tax legislation that typically associate casualty and theft losses with disasters. Nonetheless, for those unfortunate enough to have been scammed, there remains a significant tax opportunity worth considering.
Historically, tax law permitted the deduction of theft losses lacking insurance coverage. While recent legislative changes have imposed stricter constraints, limiting such deductions primarily to disaster-related scenarios, there is still a ray of hope. The tax code acknowledges that losses incurred from transactions with a profit motive might still be eligible for certain deductions.
In detail, Section 165(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code pertains to losses derived from profit-driven activities. This suggests that if your financial damage from a scam was linked to a venture intended to yield profit, you could potentially claim these losses, irrespective of a disaster declaration. Recognizing this exception could provide essential financial relief after suffering losses due to fraudulent activities.
Criteria to Claim Profit-Motivated Casualty Losses: To qualify for a theft loss under the profit-centered exception, several rigorous criteria must be satisfied:
Profit Motive: The undertaking must primarily aim for an economic gain. Crucial evidence demonstrating the transaction had a genuine expectation of profit is necessary. Substantial documentation often substantiates this requisite through case law and IRS rulings.
Transaction Type: Typically, eligible transactions involve traditional vehicles like securities, real estate, or other income-generating activities. Social or personal transactions without a profit motive generally don't qualify.
Nature of Loss: The loss should originate directly from the transaction aimed at profit. This association should be evident through financial documentation and legal records. Investment scams or deceitful schemes targeting taxpayer investments commonly qualify provided they meet the profit criteria.
IRS Guidance Application: Applying this deduction often requires reviewing IRS memoranda and rulings for clarity on qualifying losses. A recent IRS Chief Counsel Memorandum (CCM 202511015) elaborates on scenarios where such losses are deductible:
Investment Scams: These instances, though fraudulent, can be deductible if initiated with a credible profit expectation. Taxpayers must validate transaction legitimacy and profit intent using documentation such as communications with scammers, investment contracts, and monetary proof of transfer.
Theft Losses: Profit-motivated thefts undergo unique scrutiny. The IRS specifies that these losses must arise in a context aimed at profit, not personal engagements such as lending between friends.
Disastrous Tax Consequences: Being defrauded from your IRA or tax-deferred pension can result in severe tax circumstances, depending on the nature of the account.
For traditional IRAs or tax-deferred plans, scam-induced premature withdrawals often count as taxable income, added to your yearly taxable amount potentially elevating your tax bracket and liability. Additionally, those under 59½ may incur a 10% early withdrawal penalty, adding to the financial burden.
In contrast, a Roth IRA withdrawal bears fewer immediate tax impacts, as they are funded with after-tax dollars. Usually, provided the account surpasses the five-year rule, contributions can be withdrawn free from taxes and penalties. However, early earnings withdrawals without a qualifying reason might incite taxes and penalties.
Below are examples illustrating when a scam will or won't qualify as a casualty loss and their tax implications:
Example 1: Impersonator Scam - Qualifying Personal Casualty Loss
Taxpayer 1 was deceived by an impersonator posing as a "fraud specialist," claiming their accounts were compromised. Taxpayer 1 was misled into transferring funds from IRA and non-IRA accounts into fraudulent accounts purportedly secure, but instead controlled by the scammer who funneled the funds overseas.
The deductibility of this scenario hinges on the taxpayer’s intent. The motive to secure and reinvest funds, clearly indicating a profit-oriented intention, allows the scam losses to qualify as theft losses incurred in a profit-seeking transaction.
Tax Implications:
- a. If eligible for itemized deductions, the loss can be claimed on Schedule A.
- b. However, the taxpayer must recognize traditional IRA distribution taxes and non-IRA account gains or losses, plus, for those under 59.5, the 10% penalty applies with no exception.
- c. Available funds can be redeposited into the IRA within 60 days to mitigate effects of items b. and c., contingent upon re-contribution extent.
Example 2: Romance Scam - Non-Qualifying Personal Casualty Loss
Taxpayer 2 was entangled in a romance scam, believing the scammer's tale of a relative needing medical assistance. Funds transferred from IRA and non-IRA accounts were overseas-bound, controlled by the scammer. These transactions, driven by personal motivation rather than profit intentions, failed to qualify for deductions.
Tax Implications:
- a. No deduction for casualty loss permitted.
- b. Traditional IRA withdrawals incur tax and penalties, such as the 10% early withdrawal penalty for those under 59.5 with no specific exception.
- c. Resources permitting, funds can be rolled back to an IRA within 60 days negating b. and c. impacts considering re-contribution.
Example 3: Kidnapping Scam - Non-Qualifying Personal Casualty Loss
Taxpayer 3 fell victim to a kidnapping fraud. Directed by a scammer posing threats against the taxpayer’s grandson, taxpayer 3 authorized distributions and sent funds overseas, unaware the scam involved AI-cloned grandson's voice.
The genuine profit motive, absent in this case, renders the losses non-deductible.
Implications: These examples stress evaluating intent and transaction context when discerning if scam-related instances qualify as deductible casualty losses.
Documentation and Intent: Individuals must maintain clear files, particularly in investment contexts, to substantiate future profit motive claims.
Scrutiny and Compliance: Heightened IRS scrutiny mandates strict adherence, with auditors carefully differentiating between eligible and ineligible losses.
Forging a preventive strategy is crucial. Consulting this office when receiving uncertain communications, especially before fund transfers, can offer crucial fraud prevention insight. Educating family, particularly elderly members, about scam risks can minimize losses and ensure they seek aid if targeted. Our proactive methodology safeguards assets and provides peace of mind. 
Want tax & accounting tips and insights?
Sign up for our newsletter.