Blog

We keep you up-to-date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Implications of Michigan's New Marijuana Tax Court Case

Michigan is currently at the forefront of a significant debate over cannabis taxation, with the introduction of a 24% wholesale marijuana tax that is being challenged constitutionally. This unfolding legal case is gaining nationwide attention due to its potential effects on cannabis pricing, and its broader implications on tax policy and voter-approved legislation across the United States.

Regardless of your personal connection to cannabis—or your geographical distance from Michigan—this legal battle warrants attention. The court’s decision could set a precedent for other states considering similar tax structures, potentially shaping the future landscape of cannabis taxation and regulation.

Let’s delve into the details.

Understanding Michigan’s Tax Proposal

In their 2025–2026 budget, Michigan legislators approved a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, aimed at generating funds for road infrastructure improvements. This tax is placed early in the supply chain, before the products reach dispensary shelves. Image 2

Currently, Michigan applies two existing taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis sales, approved by voters in 2018.

  • A 6% state sales tax. If the new wholesale tax is implemented, it would make Michigan’s cannabis tax structure among the most tiered in the U.S.

Reasons Behind the Lawsuit

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) has filed a lawsuit claiming the tax is unconstitutional. Their argument hinges on one crucial issue: Image 3

According to MCIA, the 2018 voter-approved marijuana law cannot be amended without a supermajority vote from the legislature. The Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) safeguards this stipulation, requiring a three-fourths supermajority for any legislative change.

The wholesale tax was passed with only a simple majority.

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol reiterated the significance of the case, noting: “As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry groups caution that such a tax hike could lead to increased costs, burden small businesses, and push consumers towards unregulated markets—trends seen in higher-tax states like California.

State’s Rationale

Michigan’s defense of the tax emphasizes its legality based on these points:

  • The wholesale tax introduces a new tax, rather than altering the 2018 marijuana law.

  • The legislature has the authority to levy taxes to meet budgetary needs.

  • The tax aims to fund road infrastructure, not to modify cannabis policy.

If the court rules in favor of the state, the tax is slated to take effect on January 1, 2026.

Impact on Consumers and Beyond

This case holds significance for all Americans, as cannabis tax frameworks often influence policies beyond state lines. Should the tax withstand legal scrutiny:

  • Wholesale prices are expected to rise.

  • Retail prices may increase to offset wholesale costs.

  • Consumers could pivot to cheaper unregulated alternatives.

  • Smaller businesses might face consolidation pressures.

However, should the tax be invalidated, Michigan will retain its current tax system, recognized for its comparatively lower costs.

National Implications

The lawsuit transcends Michigan’s borders with significant national implications:

1. Examining Voter-Protected Legislation

How far can legislators go to implement taxes without supermajority endorsement, potentially altering the power of ballot initiatives nationwide?

2. Influencing State Tax Models

States with infrastructure funding challenges could consider similar taxes if Michigan’s model succeeds.

3. Highlighting Tax Discrepancies

Cannabis taxation varies dramatically across states, with some (e.g., Oregon, Michigan) maintaining competitive tax rates that keep illegal markets at bay, while others (e.g., California) face thriving illegal sales due to high taxes.

This Michigan lawsuit could serve as a benchmark for future tax-related legal battles elsewhere.

Next Steps

A decision from the Michigan Court of Claims is anticipated soon, following initial arguments. The case might escalate to the Michigan Supreme Court.

The outcome will bear significant consequences—not only for Michigan’s cannabis sector but also for how states handle voter-backed laws, emerging markets, and tax authorities nationwide.

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .
CPA Consulting Services LLC We love to chat!
Please feel free to use the buttons below to contact us or use our Ai powered chat assistant.
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully